
Charles Bukowski is an American writer and one ugly son-of-a-bitch. He often talks about how ugly he is, but writers often do things like that and you think ‘aww…he’s just exaggerating’, but Bukowski isn’t. His dirty hair, his grimy teeth, his old skin. But His writing comes from the same place and he knows it. The tough, blunt words are his and they’re easy and interesting to read and yet make you uneasy at times. He uses words like ‘cock’, ‘fuck’, ‘bitch’ and a lot more you probably can’t think of unless you try real hard) without batting an eye. He makes everyone around his character seem a bit ugly themselves as well, so somehow it makes it all okay that all these ugly people are together, in LA, living out their lives. Their fucking lives. In some ways, you can’t help but be pulled in. The romantic fuck it attitude of his writing and story get into you and your life a little bit as well. The ease of the writing along with the ease of reading it all makes you feel like you can do it too. Not like those other stories where you gotta think about every word you read. No. No large IQ needed here. But make no mistake, it’s gotta be tough to write the way Bukowski does. If nothing else, living it is tough, and I imagine that he used a lot of his own life for inspiration.
Starr told me to read Women shortly after we’d started dating. She’d finished it and had proclaimed Bukowski her favorite writer and was already on the next book, determined to consume every one of his works until she could understand him without excuse (in the end, sleeping with him would be the only insight she’d be missing). I liked her fortitude and wished her luck (I myself used to do the same thing only with bands and music –buy every album, learn every word, then proclaim myself an expert). She’d sold me on the book by telling me he wrote like a Beatnik, but just a little too late (the 70’s). She also assured me the book would stick to the title and maybe I’d learn, or identify with, a thing or two. I was hoping for the latter. I was hoping the book could do some talking for me. Maybe defend me. If I identified with the writer and the story, I could just say, ‘Hey, this guy thinks what I think, so you read it then you know what I think. Now leave me alone and go read what I think.’ Jeez…Here I am arguing in my head and wanting to be left alone. It seems I must be fucked up too. That may be the only way you’ll like reading Women –you need to know you’re messed up (if only a little). Regardless, the book sounded good if it was anything like the picture of the author on the back.
It took me months to read. That shouldn’t be a reflection of how I felt about it (I can read a book I love for 6 months and a book I don’t care for in a few weeks –it just depends on my attitude and what’s going on in my life) I’m certainly glad I read it. It’s not for everybody, so count yourself lucky if it appeals to you. The story is about a poet, Henry Chinaski, living in LA who’s basically an old man writer just going on writing and his dealings with various women that enter and exit his day-to-day. His main love is drinking though and as I said earlier, its not easy to live this life, however romantic Chinaski makes it sound. Chinaski has no big plans, no life quest, and just goes around fucking young women and drinking (I mean really drinking) and giving us his descriptions and thoughts on the subjects. The descriptions are great. Bukowski keeps it very raw and straightforward. There’s no emotion in it, and a lot of times it’s easier to see sex for what it really is when there’s no emotion attached to it. Same with a drinking problem. By not adding any emotion, there’s a certain amount of romance added to the writing, probably because you’re able to take out all those sticky details (literally and figuratively). The lack of shame Chinaski has in telling us about all he does also makes it easier for us to go along with him and take it for what it’s worth because, well, he’s honest. Usually in these kinds of books I get caught up with a character and part of me wants to be them. This didn’t happen so much with Chinaski (though his emotions didn’t weigh on him much, which sometimes I envied. Sometimes.) I didn’t know what this meant. Was I getting older? There was a time I romanticized being a drunk writer. Throwing up before readings. Having women throw themselves at me, only to abuse them and not even care. But I fear I couldn’t handle that now. Even Chinaski finds holes in his philosophy (if not toward the end), and in this way, the character has his arch and I’m able to say it was all tied together nicely and I was happy to go along for the ride.
After this I’m going to read Harry Potter. A silly little kids book that I can’t put down when I’m reading. I’m happy to read it, but I couldn’t do it all the time. Bukowski is similiar. I’ll be back for more soon. For another stiff drink. And Women was about as stiff as they come.
Notes, Insights, Etc.
-Starr said she heard David Duchovny’s character, Hank Moody, from the Showtime show Californication was based somewhat on Bukowski. This definitely seems possible. Californication is a great show.
-Bukowski died in March of ‘94. Kurt Cobain Died a month later. Nixon died that same month. I remember hearing an adult complaining about how wrong it was that People magazine put Cobain on their cover and not Nixon.
-As this book is autobiographical, the real Bukowski lived, in the 70’s, on DeLongre Avenue. This was not only one of the sleaziest parts of Hollywood, but at the time, he was also friends with a dirty book store manager who was the father of Leonardo DiCaprio. I didn’t know Leo’s dad was the literary type.
-If you like to read about sex, or drugs, or drinking, then you’ll like this book.



